Juno

Explore findings

Ask Juno what the interviews mean, explore the findings it formed, and inspect the evidence behind every conclusion.

Analysis availability

Analysis starts with six ready interviews Analysis uses completed interviews with usable participant answers in Live mode. Findings and report generation require at least six analysis-ready Live interviews; Test-mode activity is excluded.

Findings

Open Findings to review Juno's evidence-backed conclusions. Each finding contains claims, supporting evidence, and any recorded limits or gaps.

Themes

Themes connect recurring ideas across the eligible interviews. Open one to inspect the contributing participants, evidence, disagreement, and context rather than treating frequency alone as a conclusion.

Live demo
Checkout friction

Shoppers abandon checkout when shipping costs appear late in the flow

27% of participants (8 of 30)

Perspectives 2
Participant
"I didn't expect the $6 until the very last screen. I just closed the tab — it felt sneaky."
Participant
"If shipping showed up front I would probably still buy. Finding out at the end is what annoys me."

Trace claims to evidence

Trace a claim from the finding to its participant quote, the surrounding transcript, and available audio. Open the source whenever you need to test whether the evidence supports Juno's reading.

Ask Juno about the evidence

Ask Juno what the interviews mean, what challenges a finding, how two groups differ, or which quotes best illustrate a theme. Juno can revisit the evidence and revise its reading when the evidence warrants it.

  • What are the strongest themes across these interviews?
  • How do first-time and repeat customers differ?
  • Show me the interviews that challenge this finding.
  • Pull the strongest quotes about onboarding.
  • What does the evidence not let us conclude?
  • Create an executive summary for the leadership team.

Compare segments

Ask how two participant groups differ, where they agree, and whether an apparent difference is supported across the interviews. Juno should show the evidence for each side rather than return a comparison without sources.

Check confidence and gaps

Review how strongly the evidence supports each claim, what contradicts it, and what the interviews do not establish. A gap should remain visible rather than being filled with a confident guess.